June 24, 2020
Understanding the patterns and drivers for Coral cover of benthic community in Abrolhos from 2006 to 2018.
To investigate the heterogeneity of the response variable under different sites and years.
To combine temporal dependency and hierarchical structure at the same time.
Cover Coral vs Turbity value
Cover Coral vs Turbity value Hiearchy \(\Leftrightarrow\) Longitudinal : | Hiearchy and Dynamic |
---|---|
Dynamic Cover Coral | Turbity value by sites and years |
---|---|
To introduce a dynamic hierarchy based on a quantile regression approach;
To achieve flexibility with the proposed model, so that it can be useful in many different settings;
Quantile prediction of Coral cover based on drivers values by sites and years;
Combine approach of (Kotz, Kozubowski, and Podgórski 2012), (Gelfand, Sahu, and Carlin 1996) and (Gonçalves, Migon, and Bastos 2020);
The filtered information throught the \(\tau^{th}\) quantile from random variable response \(y\) into two components: Hierarchical and dynamic;
This decomposition allows us to obtain a flexible/comparative proposal;
A robust model for heteroscedasticity and outliers.
\[\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:yhierar} \begin{aligned} y_{ij} & = X^{\prime}_{ij}\gamma_{i} + F^{\prime}_{ij}\theta_{j} + \mathcal{Q}, \quad i = 1,\ldots, I,j=1,\ldots,J;\\ \gamma_{i} &= \gamma+ v_{i}, \quad v_{i} \sim \mathcal{N}({0},V);\\ \theta_{j} &= G_{j} \theta_{j-1}+ w_{j}, \quad w_{j} \sim \mathcal{N}({0},W);\\ \theta_{0}\mid \mathcal{D}_{0} &\sim \mathcal{N}(m_{0},C_{0}). \end{aligned} \end{eqnarray}\]
\(\mathcal{Q}\) term is what enables the quantile part.
\(I-\)dimensional vector \(\gamma = (\alpha^{\prime}, \beta^{\prime})\), \((p+q_2)-\)dimensional vector \(\theta_{j}= (\mu^{\prime}_{j},\beta^{\prime}_{2j});\)
\(\mu_{1j}\), the first term of \(\theta_j\), represents the mean level of the trajectories of the \(\tau^{th}\) quantile;
\(\alpha\)
\(\beta\) \(\mu_{1j}\)